cdesCalculators, tools and market dashboards, with the method shown.

How bond ETFs move with interest rates

What happens to TLT, IEF and SHY when rates rise or fall, when the Fed buys or sells bonds, if rates go negative, and when stocks look expensive, with a look-ahead where you place Fed rate cuts and hikes on the chart. Built on iShares’ live figures and a century of history.

Your figures

Loading the tool.

How this works

What this tells you

A bond is a loan. You lend money to the US government and it pays you a fixed amount of interest every six months, then hands the money back on a set date. A bond ETF, such as SHY, IEF or TLT, is one share that holds many of these loans at once and buys new ones as the old ones come due.

This page answers five questions about these funds with charts: what happens when interest rates rise or fall, why the three funds behave so differently, what the Federal Reserve's bond buying and selling does, what negative interest rates would mean, and how bonds have fared when stocks were expensive or cheap.

Why bond prices fall when rates rise

Say you own a bond paying 3% a year. Then new bonds start paying 5%. Nobody will pay full price for your 3% bond when a 5% one is on offer, so its price drops until the two are an equally good deal. When rates fall, the opposite happens: your older, higher-paying bond becomes worth more.

Duration measures how much. It is roughly the percent a fund's price changes when rates move by 1 percentage point. TLT's duration is about 15 years, so a 1 point rise costs it about 15%. SHY's is under 2 years, so the same rise costs it under 2%. Longer loans are locked into their old rate for longer, so a rate change matters more to them.

Convexity is a small correction. The price does not move in a straight line: as rates fall, the price rises a little faster, and as they rise, it falls a little slower. It matters most for long funds and for big moves.

Why rising rates are not all bad news

The price drop happens once. But the fund keeps buying new bonds, and after rates rise those new bonds pay more. Over time that extra income makes up the loss. As a rule of thumb, if you hold a fund for about as long as its duration, a rise in rates roughly evens out. Hold longer and you end up ahead of where you would have been.

If rates never change, a bond fund is expected to return about its yield to maturity (what its bonds pay if held to the end) less its fee. The second chart in section 1 shows that since 1960, the 10-year Treasury yield at the start of a decade has been a close guide to what 10-year Treasuries returned over it.

The Federal Reserve buying or selling bonds

When the Fed creates money to buy bonds (quantitative easing, or QE), it becomes a very large extra buyer. More demand for the same bonds raises their prices and lowers their yields. When it shrinks its holdings (quantitative tightening, or QT), other investors have to buy those bonds instead, and they want a higher yield to do it.

Research on the first round of QE, in 2008 and 2009, found long-term yields fell sharply on the days the Fed announced purchases. Over the whole period, though, the 10-year yield rose, as the economy recovered and inflation worries grew. The Fed is one force on rates among several. The model on this page lets you set how strong it is and add an offsetting rise from inflation worries.

Negative rates

A negative rate means lenders pay to lend. It sounds impossible, but German, Swiss and Japanese government bonds all had negative yields in the late 2010s. If US rates fell that far, bond prices would jump, long ones enormously. After that, though, the fund would earn a negative yield every year, slowly giving the gain back. A gain from falling rates happens once. The low income that follows lasts as long as the rates stay low.

Expensive and cheap stock markets

The CAPE ratio is the price of the S&P 500 divided by its average inflation-adjusted earnings over the past ten years. A high number means stocks are expensive compared with what companies have earned. Since 1928, when stocks started a decade cheap, they beat Treasuries every time. When they started expensive, bonds won almost as often as they lost. Bond returns themselves did not depend much on stock prices. What changed was how much stocks had left to give.

The last chart compares the earnings yield (earnings divided by price, the P/E ratio upside down) with the 10-year Treasury yield. It shows how much a dollar in stocks earns next to what a dollar in bonds pays.

Looking ahead: stocks against bonds, with your own Fed moves

The last section lets you set your own expectations. A stock index's price is its companies' earnings times what buyers are willing to pay for each dollar of them, the P/E ratio. So you choose how fast earnings grow and where the P/E ends up. If the P/E falls from today's level, that drag comes off the return every year.

For the bond fund, the rate chart starts from today's real numbers: the Fed's rate and the fund's yield. From there, you map out the Fed moves you expect. Click the chart to add a cut or hike, as many as you like, or click a dot to turn it around or remove it. Each move changes the fund's yield by the same amount, so its price jumps that month, just as in the rate-move chart at the top.

The result compares $1 in each: the total return so far, and the yearly average return it works out to. Hover the chart to read both at any point.

What this does not account for

  • Rates at every maturity rarely move together. Short and long rates often move by different amounts.
  • The funds' figures come from iShares' pages, read by this site at most twice a day. If they cannot be loaded, the page says so and uses the figures from September 29, 2026.
  • In the look-ahead, Fed moves change the bond fund only. In reality they also move stock prices.
  • Long-term yields often move less than the Fed's rate, and bond prices move ahead of the Fed when traders expect a change. The look-ahead moves the fund's yield by the full amount, on the day.
  • The historical returns are for a 10-year Treasury bond, not for these three ETFs, which began in 2002.
  • The Fed model rests on research about one period, 2008–2010. Nobody knows how precisely it applies to future buying or selling, and selling has been studied less than buying.
  • Taxes, trading costs and gaps between an ETF's market price and the value of its bonds are left out.
  • Past relationships between stock prices and bond returns are history, not a forecast.